On autogenerated ChangeLog
- From: Behdad Esfahbod <behdad behdad org>
- To: desktop-devel-list <desktop-devel-list gnome org>, gnome-infrastructure <gnome-infrastructure gnome org>
- Subject: On autogenerated ChangeLog
- Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:54:56 -0400
Hey,
I first wrote Makefile.am magic for Pango to generate ChangeLog from git on
demand. Those macros have been modified and gathered in
http://live.gnome.org/Git/ChangeLog to only generate ChangeLog for "make
dist". I wonder what people actually want to have, so I can work on canonical
macros to copy across projects (and eventually find a better way to
distribute). Pros and cons:
Pros for generating ChangeLog proper:
- No need to have a placeholder ChangeLog, nor need to pass "foreign" to
automake
- You can "make ChangeLog" and inspect it before it goes into the tarball
Cons:
- Have to modify autogen.sh to create an empty ChangeLog, or pass the
"foreign" flag to automake
Humm, no idea about pros and cons of the other approach. So, what do people
think?
Cheers,
behdad
PS. If you need any autotools hacking, related to git or not, feel free to
ping me. I'd always be happy to help.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]