Re: Metacity, Mutter, GNOME Shell, GNOME-2.28
- From: Dodji Seketeli <dodji seketeli org>
- To: Tomas Frydrych <tf linux intel com>
- Cc: Tomas Frydrych <tf o-hand com>, gnome-shell-list gnome org, Josselin Mouette <joss debian org>, desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Metacity, Mutter, GNOME Shell, GNOME-2.28
- Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 14:24:32 +0200
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Tomas Frydrych a écrit :
> Josselin Mouette wrote:
>> I don’t think maintaining a few more packages (especially packages that
>> already exist today) is a big effort. But it stills bother me if we are
>> going to propose two entirely different user experiences with two
>> different configurations. For the end user, it will just feel like we
>> are shipping two desktop environments.
>
> I think that is a wrong way of looking at it; we are going to be
> shipping one, unified desktop environment with a particular set of HW
> requirements. In addition to this it will be possible to downgrade this
> to the older Gnome desktop environment for legacy HW that does not meet
> the requirements.
I couldn't agree more.
Furthermore, this is already the case today. The GNOME based environment running
on my N810 tablet is different from the one I run on my "big iron" desktop
machine. And I find that very cool that we can have different flavors of GNOME
tailored for different HW capabilities - if, of course, we can afford it.
I am not sure users are complaining about that state of things today.
D.
- --
Tant que l'on n'a pas la tête coupée, on peut espérer mettre un chapeau.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Remi - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkngjAAACgkQPejI7lrem2HQFwCggYVwEx+2iOKTrR0KJfcfH4nd
YFgAn0g2TzuBnhqRpUJHScQrybrSCemv
=FPXT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]