Re: GNOME 3.0 Schedule draft; Streamlining of the Platform.

[Alberto Ruiz <aruiz gnome org>]

2009/4/2 Ross Burton <ross burtonini com>:
> On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 13:20 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
>>       * Still to discuss: dconf vs gconf. This is not yet covered by
>>         this plan, but crucial to discuss (as gconf depends on
>> Bonobo)
>
> There is gconf-dbus, the long-standing port of GConf to DBus that
> Imendio did for Maemo.  Moblin also ships it and it shouldn't be *too*
> difficult to merge it back[1].

My understanding on this after talking with Richard Hult, is that
there is no GConf maintainer, and the DBus port is a huge hack and not
really suitable for the main branch, and that a proper merge would
need a lot of work.

> Ross
>
> [1] I may regret saying this
> --
> Ross Burton                                 mail: ross burtonini com
>                                          jabber: ross burtonini com
>                                           www: http://burtonini.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> desktop-devel-list mailing list
> desktop-devel-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
>



-- 
Un saludo,
Alberto Ruiz