Re: Module proposal: Empathy for GNOME 2.24

["Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro" <gjc inescporto pt>]

On Thu, 2008-03-27 at 11:39 +0000, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 15:39 -0700, Ethan Osten wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 19:32 +0100, Sven Herzberg wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > Am Mittwoch, den 26.03.2008, 19:13 +0100 schrieb Xavier Claessens:
> > > > Did I forgot something?
> > > > Xavier Claessens.
> > > 
> > > Missing password security. And absolute no-go in the current shape.
> > 
> > Hi.
> > 
> > As an outside developer who very much wants to use Empathy in his
> > program, but also wants to rest assured that it will be widely available
> > and supported and used first[1], I have to say that I don't find your
> > attitude here at all helpful. What's the benefit here to being overtly
> > confrontational?
> > 
> > If you have issues with the Empathy codebase - and it certainly seems
> > that you do - *please* try to bring them up in a civil manner, so that
> > they can be discussed and resolved. Otherwise, all you're doing is
> > inciting flamewars, which helps no one and keeps the real issues from
> > being addressed.
> 
> I'm sorry, I disagree, and I really hate when people react this way.
> Sven was not being confrontational.
> 
> Saying "Missing password security" is just being factual, albeit
> syntetic.  "And absolute no-go in the current shape" is just pointing
> out that lack of security is a feature that, in his opinion, should
> block inclusion in the desktop.  [ I agree with this view, BTW, but that
> is beside the point ].
> 
> I am tired sick of people accusing other people of causing flamewars.

  Oops, please remove the 'sick' word; it was an accident, I swear! :P

-- 
Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro
<gjc inescporto pt> <gustavo users sourceforge net>
"The universe is always one step beyond logic" -- Frank Herbert