Re: GNOME 2.23 Schedule

["Felipe Contreras" <felipe contreras gmail com>]

On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 9:10 PM, Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net> wrote:
>
>  On Tue, 2008-03-18 at 19:55 +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
>  > On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 08:16:21PM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>  <snip>
>
> > > There's a bug report for that dating 2003:
>  > > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103817
>  > >
>  > > Forget about patches, there's a nautilus extension packaged and everything!
>  >
>  > Meaning: developers did their job, up to the distro to ensure it is
>  > installed by default?
>
>  It's a shame that an extension is the wrong way to go about fixing that
>  problem as well.

The point being made is that users did their job (bug reporting),
potential GNOME developers did their job (implementation).

The ones that didn't do their job where official GNOME developers
(provide feedback). Of course it cannot be assumed that all the bug
reports are properly followed, but at least the important ones should.

Without votes it's hard to see important bugs being ignored.

Best regards.

-- 
Felipe Contreras