Re: Proposal: enable accessibility by default for GNOME
- From: "Diego Escalante Urrelo" <diegoe gnome org>
- To: "Bastien Nocera" <hadess hadess net>
- Cc: Willie Walker <William Walker sun com>, desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Proposal: enable accessibility by default for GNOME
- Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:56:05 -0500
On 7/30/08, Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 12:00 -0400, Willie Walker wrote:
> > Hi All:
> >
> > I recently had a nice discussion with the release team about the
> > viability of enabling accessibility (i.e., the AT-SPI infrastructure)
> > by
> > default for GNOME. As a result of that discussion, I'm approaching
> > the
> > broader GNOME community with a proposal to do this. :-)
>
>
> I'd agree if you can show that there's little to no performance hit from
> enabling it. I'd go even further and say that we should not make it
> possible to disable it within the UI if you can show that it won't have
> adverse effects on most users (that don't need a11y...).
>
I have froze my whole session by getting the at-spi stuff to crash.
More concrete examples include eog not loading images anymore after
crashing at.
And I gotta say my crashes were random, happened in 2.20, 2.22.
Last time I asked, I was told that the a11y support was really evil
regarding crashes because of limitations of orbit/bonobo/something.
I'm against as long as it's not crash free, guaranteed.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]