Re: This proposal doesn't imply extra work (was: Requiring DOAP instead of MAINTAINERS file)

On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 14:43 +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
> >  - no support for git or bzr
> It is for GNOME SVN. Why should I care ATM for git/bzr? I'd like some
> *existing* format that includes that. However, couldn't find anything
> and I hate making a new format and then having to recreate whatever
> exists for some existing format.

Also as DOAP is RDF, we can add new fields without any problems.

That said, I'm pretty sure Edd would add more repository predicates.
I've a local doap-based hack which supports <BzrRepository>.

Ross Burton                                 mail: ross burtonini com
                                          jabber: ross burtonini com
 PGP Fingerprint: 1A21 F5B0 D8D0 CFE3 81D4 E25A 2D09 E447 D0B4 33DF

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]