Re: State of gvfs in Gnome 2.21
- From: "Matthias Clasen" <matthias clasen gmail com>
- To: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: State of gvfs in Gnome 2.21
- Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 11:15:52 -0500
On Feb 12, 2008 10:01 AM, Alexander Larsson <alexl redhat com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 16:13 +0200, Lucas Rocha wrote:
> I can't say I'm happy about something like that though, since I spent
> the last 1.5 years or so trying to make this happen for 2.22. And if it
> gets postponed the code will get little or no testing and little use by
> apps, so I'm not sure it will be in a much better shape once 2.24 comes
> around.
Yeah, I fully agree here. One thing we have seen with gio is that it
is fine to work on something in your own little branch, and give talks
about it, etc, etc, but real review and feedback only happens when the
new stuff actually appears on the trunk, and people are forced to deal
with it.
The consequence of this is that the 6 month release cycle is a bit
tight to go all the way from "getting api feedback" to "stable without
any end-user visible regressions"...
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]