Re: GNOME 2.21.90 Development Release

["Lucas Rocha" <lucasr gnome org>]

Hi,

2008/2/1, Elijah Newren <newren gmail com>:
> On Jan 31, 2008 3:21 PM, Mike Kestner <mkestner gmail com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 21:49 -0700, Elijah Newren wrote:
> > > =================================
> > > GNOME 2.21.90 Development Release
> > > =================================
> >
> > Hey Elijah,
> >
> > I noticed that you folks picked up gnome-sharp-2.19.91 for this release.
> > In our current development releases, we have split the existing
> > gnome-sharp binding set into two packages: gnome-sharp and
> > gnome-desktop-sharp.
> >
> > We have moved our rsvg, vte, and gtkhtml bindings from gnome-sharp to
> > gnome-desktop-sharp in an attempt to clarify the stable/unstable status
> > of the APIs.  We also have added a few new bindings to
> > gnome-desktop-sharp.
> >
> > I didn't officially pursue inclusion of gnome-desktop-sharp for 2.22
> > because of the timing of when all this started coming together, though
> > at this point, I'm confident gnome-desktop-sharp 2.20 will be ready when
> > GNOME 2.22 ships.
> >
> > It would be great if the gnome-desktop-sharp package can be included in
> > 2.22.  If it's too late or too controversial to do so at this point,  I
> > would suggest that you revert to gnome-sharp 2.16.x for 2.22, since
> > shipping gnome-sharp 2.20 without gnome-desktop-sharp will remove
> > functionality.
> >
> > Let me know if I can provide any more info.
>
> Given that it's primarily a split of an existing module, I think it'd
> make sense to include both rather than reverting.
>
> What does everyone else say?

I see no problem with inclusing both. Just one question: you said
"gnome-desktop-sharp 2.20 will be ready when GNOME 2.22 ships". Does
it mean it's not ready now? What's missing?

--lucasr