Re: GNOME 2.21.90 Development Release
- From: "Elijah Newren" <newren gmail com>
- To: "Mike Kestner" <mkestner gmail com>
- Cc: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GNOME 2.21.90 Development Release
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 18:45:43 -0700
On Jan 31, 2008 3:21 PM, Mike Kestner <mkestner gmail com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 21:49 -0700, Elijah Newren wrote:
> > =================================
> > GNOME 2.21.90 Development Release
> > =================================
>
> Hey Elijah,
>
> I noticed that you folks picked up gnome-sharp-2.19.91 for this release.
> In our current development releases, we have split the existing
> gnome-sharp binding set into two packages: gnome-sharp and
> gnome-desktop-sharp.
>
> We have moved our rsvg, vte, and gtkhtml bindings from gnome-sharp to
> gnome-desktop-sharp in an attempt to clarify the stable/unstable status
> of the APIs. We also have added a few new bindings to
> gnome-desktop-sharp.
>
> I didn't officially pursue inclusion of gnome-desktop-sharp for 2.22
> because of the timing of when all this started coming together, though
> at this point, I'm confident gnome-desktop-sharp 2.20 will be ready when
> GNOME 2.22 ships.
>
> It would be great if the gnome-desktop-sharp package can be included in
> 2.22. If it's too late or too controversial to do so at this point, I
> would suggest that you revert to gnome-sharp 2.16.x for 2.22, since
> shipping gnome-sharp 2.20 without gnome-desktop-sharp will remove
> functionality.
>
> Let me know if I can provide any more info.
Given that it's primarily a split of an existing module, I think it'd
make sense to include both rather than reverting.
What does everyone else say?
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]