Re: Reduced Bugzilla functionality for 6+ months -- acceptable?

On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 06:42:36PM +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
> Le jeudi 04 décembre 2008, à 17:00 +0100, Olav Vitters a écrit :
> > Is above acceptable?
> The current situation is a dead-end, so I'm all for moving, even if we
> lose some stuff.

Yeah, but I need to know:
 * what priority should the missing stuff get (to determine order of
 * what is critical (e.g. affects GNOME release if missing for more than
   at most 4 weeks)

Missing functionality ok, causing 2.26 to suck is not.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]