Re: Proposal: enable accessibility by default for GNOME
- From: Shaun McCance <shaunm gnome org>
- To: Patryk Zawadzki <patrys pld-linux org>
- Cc: Willie Walker <William Walker sun com>, desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Proposal: enable accessibility by default for GNOME
- Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 10:59:03 -0500
On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 17:29 +0200, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 5:19 PM, Shaun McCance <shaunm gnome org> wrote:
> > That sounds nice, but I don't
> > see how just enabling AT-SPI et al accomplishes this.
> >
> > For instance, if a blind user logs in, she'll still have
> > to navigate to the accessibility preferences to enable a
> > screen reader. Granted, with accessibility already loaded,
> > she won't have to log out and back in. But it's still five
> > or so completely blind clicks she has to manage to make.
> >
> > Since you don't seem to be proposing enabling any particular
> > accessibility tool by default (and enabling them all would
> > be insane), what's the proposal for how to deal with this?
> > To an average user, the core infrastructure being loaded
> > doesn't mean anything if the tool she needs isn't there.
>
> Hotkey/gesture activation at the GDM prompt level (at least it used to
> work this way).
Fair enough, though I wonder how discoverable these activation
methods are. But then shouldn't GDM be able to decide whether
to launch accessibility support for the desktop based on this?
--
Shaun
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]