Re: WebKit and GNOME

Hi Maciej,

Maciej Stachowiak wrote:

On Apr 1, 2008, at 3:44 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:

On Apr 1, 2008, at 12:13 PM, David Bolter wrote:

Hi Maciej,

Thanks very much for providing this information. I have a brief
comment about your accessibility section below:

This wording "Sometimes ARIA is mentioned in the context of
accessibility - this is an interesting technology for future web
apps" doesn't seem quite right to me. ARIA enabled browsers such as
Firefox provide access to ARIA enabled DHTML applications today.
Opera and IE8 are adding support today. Google is putting ARIA into
its web applications.

So far as I know, there isn't any major web app yet that is already
using ARIA. I would appreciate correction on this front if I have
missed anything.

By the way, just to be clear, I do not mean to imply that ARIA is not an important technology, or that it is "far future". Just that, in my estimation, basic accessibility integration is much more beneficial to users, in the short to medium term. (ARIA will probably be quite feasible to implement in a cross-platform way once the basic accessibility code is cross-platform.)

Yes my original reply got trimmed a bit so I'll paste in the missing part again: "I do however agree that addressing the cross platform accessibility strategy in WebKit should come first and wish WebKit the best in this endeavor."

Good luck, and I really hope the WebKit accessibility person(s) can take advantage of the help the GNOME and Mozilla communities can provide in making sure that cross platform WebKit accessibility can fly.


It is up to the GNOME project of course whether you will attach any specific feature requirements to accepting WebKit as an external dependency.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]