Re: Moving libxml2 and libxslt to external dependencies

On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 04:41 -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 10:24:57AM +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > 
> > On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 19:41 -0400, Hubert Figuiere wrote:
> > > I can't speak for libxml++ maintainer, but given that libxml++ depends
> > > on Glib::ustring, it should stay at most in the bindings.\
> > 
> > That's a strange logic. External dependencies should be allowed to use,
> > for instance, glib.
> > 
> > If libxml is removed from the GNOME Platform then libxml++ should be
> > removed too. (I'm the maintainer).
>   That's also  a strange logic to me. libxml2 gets out of the GNOME platform
> because I think it comes with the OS and its updates are really OS related
> not GNOME releases related. If that's the case for libxml++ too then this
> makes sense, but I'm not sure it's true at this point.

The GNOME Platform Bindings are meant to wrap the GNOME Development

murrayc murrayc com

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]