+1 from me. :-) Philip On Fri, 2007-09-21 at 17:50 -0500, Diego Escalante Urrelo wrote: > Hey everyone, > > We discussed this last few days on bugsquad list about the following, > we didn't find anything negative about it we are letting you know > about it, feel free to comment about it. > > Proposal: Drop crasher reports from 2.16 and before > > Reasons: > 1. They are really old and most of them are answered "well yes, try > SVN/last-release it [might be] fixed there", or simply ignored. They > only make bugzilla noisy, hence making difficult to find useful reports. > 2. It is unlikely any new crasher will occur. As we've been triaging > these crashers for over a year, the chance of a new 2.16-specific > crasher is not worth the amount of time it takes to triage the dupes. > > You can easily confirm if a crash report is old enough by checking > metadata provided by bug-buddy like the distribution (for example > Ubuntu 6.10) and of course the version. > > Greetings! > > Diego > _______________________________________________ > desktop-devel-list mailing list > desktop-devel-list gnome org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part