Re: Git vs SVN (was: Can we improve things?)

It is worth noting that the new release of subversion will support
some of its own merge tracking (which would/will be nice).

I think the proposal to add git-daemon to is a good
idea, no weather the best move is to immediately use git in this
capacity or to examine the possibility of using one of the other
DSCM's (see for the evolving
discussion of advantages/disadvantages) I'm more or less impartial on
this point, however, I do think its something that should be
considered, as whichever we choose for this private hosting will
invariably become the immediate frontrunner for the eventual

On 9/14/07, Hubert Figuiere <hub figuiere net> wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 20:21 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 05:36:36AM -0700, Sanford Armstrong wrote:
> > > Yes, using a command called "svndumpfilter".  You'd have to not care
> > > about your revision numbers being resequenced.
> >
> > People care about that?
> >
> > I always renumber them. However, by default it doesn't.
> When using svnmerge, it stores the revision # already merged. That would
> break it if the revision are renumbered.
> Just my $0.02.
> Hub
> _______________________________________________
> desktop-devel-list mailing list
> desktop-devel-list gnome org

Kevin Kubasik

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]