Re: Proposed suite: developer tools

["Elijah Newren" <newren gmail com>]

On 1/8/07, Vincent Untz <vuntz gnome org> wrote:
> This is a thread about the whole suite. This is not about glade3, or
> anjuta, or monodevelop, or devhelp.
>
> The question is: is this suite a good idea or a bad idea?

As with the others, I like the idea in general.  Another question:
Should we hold it up to the same standards as e.g. the bindings suite?
The bindings suite ran unofficially and in parallel for one cycle to
give everyone on both sides a chance to see if deadlines and release
rules could be met without undue difficulty or pain.  Do we want to do
something similar with the developer tools suite?

Elijah