Re: pulseaudio vs gnome

["Sean Kelley" <svk sweng gmail com>]

On 1/20/07, Marc-André Lureau <marcandre lureau gmail com> wrote:

On 1/20/07, Ronald S. Bultje < rbultje ronald bitfreak net> wrote:

On Sat, 2007-01-20, Damon chaplin wrote:
> Before it goes in I'd like to see a clear roadmap for audio in GNOME,
> with support for things from simple beeps up to pro-audio apps.
>
> I guess this means gstreamer, PulseAudio and JACK. Is that the plan?

esd is in the platform because it already is. Realistically, it doesn't
belong here. Any replacement technology _to have complete feature
equiality with esd_ should be completely optional and a user should be

snip!

That probably means something like GStreamer to make it bearable for
applications that really don't care and just want to play song.mp3 or
beeps. And that should suffice.

This remark pops up an interesting question: do we really want gnome apps linked to GStreamer to play "bling"? Furthermore, is GStreamer  API suitable for a simple desktop applications (nautilus, mozilla, notify, bling API...) ? I have posted a proposal to define an API for desktop sound on freedesktop/dapi/gnome-media mailing lists (without much success) - but once again, we don't care about implementation at this stage (wether it uses a daemon or not, if it use GStreamer or Pulse or anything else). I really think we need to discuss such idea to replace the libgnome sound API. Of course, it would be good to have people from GStreamer/DBus/PulseAudio discuss such idea also.

Just an fyi, but In embedded systems running Gtk+, you don't want to have to spend the time to initialize/start up Gstreamer just to play "bling".  The time lag is far too great.  You limit Gstreamer use to items like movie and music playback - not system pings.

Sean
 

If you look at the code that use esd directly, its only because libgnome doesn't provide a simple/complete sound API. And now its time to fix libgnome sound to get rid of esd.  At the same time, lets bring some new cool things like theming/positionning/introspection & control... But that is probably not the good place to discuss this in detail.

After FOMS and DAM3, one has said that new mailing lists will be created to discuss desktop audio API. I would like to define also a *sound desktop* API. Where are those mailing lists? anyone?
enough for now,

best regards,

--
Marc-André Lureau, GSmartMix
_______________________________________________
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list