Re: Proposed module: gvfs

["Matthias Clasen" <matthias clasen gmail com>]

On Dec 21, 2007 3:57 PM, Shaun McCance <shaunm gnome org> wrote:

>
> The gio documentation itself could use some love (at least
> according to what I'm seeing on library.gnome.org).  That
> is at least partially relevant to the discussion, because:
>  1) gvfs is only relevant if we use gio, and
>  2) gio should be well-documented if we expect developers
>     to switch to it.
> On the other hand, it's not as if gnome-vfs has exemplary
> documentation, and that's the status quo if we don't start
> using gio.

I don't know whats on library.gnome.org, but the api docs in the gio
module are at 98% coverage right now. You can always do better, and
the docs are still a bit light in terms of concepts, examples and
migration instructions, but the API reference itself is in decent
shape, I think.

Matthias