Re: Updating the icon cache (GNOME Goals)

[Elliot Peele <elliot rpath com>]

For us it doesn't really matter because conary takes care of running
gtk-update-icon-cache when the icons in a package change or a new
package containing icons are installed.

Elliot

On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 16:44 -0500, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I just saw this http://live.gnome.org/GnomeGoals/AppIcon about making
> apps update the GTK+ icon cache during "make install".
> 
> This would be fine in a tarball-only world, but I wonder if distros will
> just end up patching out that part of Makefiles, and calling
> gtk-update-icon-cache on their own.
> 
> For example, in openSUSE we update the icon cache separately from
> package installation, with the idea that the cache will only be updated
> once even if many packages are installed.  (The really right way may be
> to use an RPM %posttrans - no idea if that works.)
> 
> So, do we really need this in tarballs?
> 
>   Federico
> 
> _______________________________________________
> distributor-list mailing list
> distributor-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/distributor-list
-- 
Elliot Peele
rPath, Inc.
elliot rpath com
919.851.3984 2117