On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 13:46 -0700, Jeff Waugh wrote in another thread: > (However, this is not on-topic for this list -- I suggest you post general > discussion stuff like this to gnome-hackers Which gave me pause: I had long been under the impression that desktop-devel-list, despite it's legacy name, was *the* GNOME Hackers' mailing list. [So of course I just discovered gnome-hackers gnome org, but there isn't much on it recently and in any case most of whats there seemed to be cc's from other lists I'm already on. More to the point, newcomers to the GNOME community are always seem to be pointed here. For what it's worth, I find desktop-devel-list more to do with the general progress of GNOME as whole than any one aspect of it and fascinating as a result] Perhaps somewhere in all the web re-development efforts that are underway, a list could be written up advising new developers the canonical reference lists that they really ought to be a member of if they choose to be a contributor to GNOME? AfC Sydney -- Andrew Frederick Cowie Technology strategy, managing change, establishing procedures, and executing successful upgrades to mission critical business infrastructure. http://www.operationaldynamics.com/ Sydney New York Toronto London
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part