Re: Information needed: Modules in official GNOME releases but not on the official release cycle

[Behdad Esfahbod <behdad behdad org>]

On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 11:42 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> So I was trying to improve our release documentation by coming up with
> a list of modules in official GNOME release sets that do not follow
> the GNOME release cycle, such as gtk+.  We have discouraged adding
> such modules as time has gone on, but there are still lots of existing
> modules like this from 2.0 and early 2.x days.  Problem is, I wasn't
> around for all the discussions way back then, and I really don't know
> the state of all modules (nor even all the reasons for this
> splitting).
> 
> It'd be really helpful if people could read over my initial draft and
> provide corrections and clarifications:
> 
>   http://live.gnome.org/ReleasePlanning/SeparateReleaseCycleModules

Pango totally follows GNOME's release cycle.

Dasher does too as far as I remember.


> Thanks,
> Elijah
-- 
behdad
http://behdad.org/

"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little
 Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
        -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759