Re: getting on a longer release cycled

[Pat Suwalski <pat suwalski net>]

Elijah Newren wrote:
> I used to be firmly in favor of the 6-month cycle, but I found
> Andrew's argument quite convincing and it has turned me into more of a
> fence sitter for now.  It isn't yet clear to me that a change would be
> a definite improvement, let alone enough of a benefit to merit the
> change in the process, but that may well change.

I think this is why an alternating 6 and 12 month cycle would be nice. A 
9 month cycle would be even more interesting, because the dates would 
not always fall at the same times.

--Pat