Re: Proposal to add Orca to GNOME 2.16
- From: Don Scorgie <DonScorgie Blueyonder co uk>
- To: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Proposal to add Orca to GNOME 2.16
- Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 19:11:05 +0100
On Mon, 2006-06-12 at 08:38 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > Today at 17:41, Sri Ramkrishna wrote:
> >
> >> So there's been no comment on this (or I must have missed it). Are we
> >> considering Orca for GNOME 2.16[1]?
> >
> > It is pretty clear that we want to replace Gnopernicus with Orca,
> > especially since Gnopernicus maintainers support that as well.
>
> It is? Where have they said this? If so, that would resolve a lot of
> confusion.
>
> Or is the old "This'll make them actually comment on it." trick?
The gnopernicus maintainers commented on the ocra list (linked to in this thread
somewhere):
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/orca-list/2006-June/msg00004.html
Don
>
> > Who are we to argue them? ;)
>
>
> Murray Cumming
> murrayc murrayc com
> www.murrayc.com
> www.openismus.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> desktop-devel-list mailing list
> desktop-devel-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]