Re: Putting the 'Mono debate' back on the rails

[Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>]

On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 11:52 -0500, Mike Kestner wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 18:32 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
> 
> > These optional builds don't help much, unless people are using gentoo
> > (or other source-based distros).
> > 
> > If the binary package was built with glade support then distros are
> > unlikely to change their binary package in the future to remove the
> > glade support. That would be an ABI break.
> 
> Seems like you're just being argumentative, now.
> 
> Is the goal here to reinvent Gtk# in Gtkmm's image, or to satisfy the
> requirements of the release set?  Last time I checked, libglade was a
> platform library.

I do not understand you (or your colleagues) always need to be so
aggressive and insulting every time this is discussed. What part of my
email made you feel that was necessary?

-- 
Murray Cumming
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com