Re: New modules in 2.14



On Fri, 2006-01-20 at 09:11 +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote:

> I think crippling functionality because Hal hasn't been ported to some 
> OSs yet is unreasonable. The alternative would be to provide a myriad of 
> small daemons that need to be individually ported, and that time could 
> be better spent on providing hal and giving us some consistency between 
> hardware access on different platforms.

I'm not talking about crippling functionality; or saying that people
can't use it. I'm saying let's not commit to it in Desktop at this
point.

Is there absolutely any reason it *must* be in Desktop?

Should we include NetworkManager is Desktop also?

--d

-- 
Davyd Madeley

http://www.davyd.id.au/
08B0 341A 0B9B 08BB 2118  C060 2EDD BB4F 5191 6CDA




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]