Re: Trying to reach consensus for the proposed modules

[Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo gnome-db org>]

On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 17:55 +1300, John Williams wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 22:47 +0000, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> 
> > >  + gnome-screensaver: people want this. I'd say we should go with it
> > > and
> > > I believe it's the general consensus, but maybe some people think it's
> > > not ready yet?
> > 
> > Drop-in replacement for xscreensaver, but with a decent UI. I'm in.
> 
> Kind of.  On my Fedora Core 4 system, we have:
> 
> rpm -e xscreensaver-base xscreensaver-extras
> error: Failed dependencies:
>         xscreensaver is needed by (installed)
> control-center-2.12.2-1.1.fc4.nr.i386
>         xscreensaver-extras is needed by (installed)
> gnome-screensaver-0.0.24-1.1.fc4.nr.i386
> 
control center (and other gnome modules) try to use gnome-screensaver if
installed, and if not, they fall back to xscreensaver, so you can make
the control-center package depend on either xscreensaver/g-s.
-- 
Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo gnome-db org>