Re: GNOME Power Manager

["Elijah Newren" <newren gmail com>]

On 4/21/06, Richard Hughes <hughsient gmail com> wrote:
> 24th April is the end of new modules proposal period.
>
> Are there any unaddressed concerns or questions regarding
> gnome-power-manager that people want to ask?

<snip>

> Do to sum up, I really think including g-p-m would be a good idea, as
> it's required to start to integrate other stuff like nautilus and
> gnome-screensaver fully, providing a kick-arse integrated desktop.

The email kinds of read like new-modules-are-chosen-next-week.  Don't
know if you meant that, but let me throw out a little clarification
anyway:

A big reason for the change in the module-proposal-method this cycle
was in order to separate the deadline by which modules must be
proposed and the deadline by which the officially accepted modules
were to be chosen.  I think we were plain crazy to have both be the
same date in previous cycles, as it often led to getting decisions
much, much later than we wanted.  So, we've still got a few more
months before the decision of new modules (just a few more months of
bickering...).

For what it's worth, though, +1 g-p-m.  :-)