Re: Mono bindings a blessed dependency? [Was: Tomboy in 2.16]

[Alex Graveley <alex beatniksoftware com>]

HELLO?!  Check 1-2-3?

The discussion *was* about Tomboy.  An small app I wrote that people 
like, and which could benefit from adoption in GNOME.  Thanks for 
throwing any chance for productive discussion out the window.

Maybe I'll wait until 2.20 to propose again.  Maybe...

-Alex

Luis Villa wrote:
> On 4/20/06, Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 22:38 +0200, David Neary wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Elijah Newren said:
> > > > But, a more important question: We currently only allow apps using the
> > > > python bindings into the desktop.
> > > Is this true, or is it just because no-one's ever asked?
> > We've had extensive discussions about it on this list. Python is the
> > only one that almost nobody objects to, and a lot of people would prefer
> > us not to use too many programming languages in the official Desktop
> > modules.
> >
> > But luckily, not everything needs to be in the Desktop. I certainly
> > wouldn't want to add the political, technical, and strategic baggage for
> > just a note taking utility.
>
> But lets be honest here. This discussion isn't about tomboy. We need
> built in search; we're getting some of our best reviews in ages
> because of our (currently optional) built in search:
>
> http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1948842,00.asp?kc=EWRSS03129TX1K0000616
>
> If this discussion is about any app in particular (it probably
> shouldn't be, but it probably will be) this discussion is really about
> beagle, not tomboy.
>
> Luis (why, what a big pink elephant you have in your pants^Wroom)
> _______________________________________________
> desktop-devel-list mailing list
> desktop-devel-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list