Re: Mono bindings a blessed dependency? [Was: Tomboy in 2.16]

[Steve Frécinaux <nudrema gmail com>]

Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> I think we should allow everything written with a blessed binding,
> provided that code is optional (like nautilus+beagle integration, for
> instance), so that we don't force 3rd parties to use them if they don't
> want to.

As soon as you include it in the desktop, the developpers won't consider 
the "optional" word anymore : any gnome application can depend on any 
part of the desktop, since every gnome installation should provide the 
whole package set...