Re: Re:Mono bindings a blessed dependency? [Was: Tomboy in 2.16]
- From: Vincent Untz <vuntz gnome org>
- To: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Re:Mono bindings a blessed dependency? [Was: Tomboy in 2.16]
- Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 23:00:43 +0200
Le jeudi 20 avril 2006 �2:38 +0200, David Neary a �it :
>
> Hi,
>
> Elijah Newren said:
> > But, a more important question: We currently only allow apps using the
> > python bindings into the desktop.
>
> Is this true, or is it just because no-one's ever asked? I don't see any
> reason why a gtkmm app like glom couldn't be considered for the desktop
> - I wasn't aware any gtkmm apps had actually asked to be incuded in the
> core desktop release.
Hrm. I'd say no-one asked :-)
> > There are other languages bindings
> > in our release set, but none of them have been similarly blessed.
> > Assuming Gtk# is added to the bindings set, should it be a language
> > core apps can use?
>
> That's an interesting question - put another way, should the desktop
> depend on the bindings? I certainly wouldn't have a problem with that -
> although making GNOME depend on Mono is an issue which would give me
> more pause than making it depend on gtkmm.
The desktop already depends on the bindings since we have some python
love in the desktop :-) The question is, do we accept all languages in
the desktop, or just a small selection of what's available in the
bindings (and which selection?).
Vincent
--
Les gens heureux ne sont pas press�
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]