Re: Mono bindings a blessed dependency? [Was: Tomboy in 2.16]



On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 22:28 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
> Le jeudi 20 avril 2006 à 14:19 -0600, Elijah Newren a écrit :
> > So, new question we have to address before addressing Alex's proposal:
> > Should Mono be a valid dependency and C# a blessed language?
> 
> I believe the answer should be yes. We're starting to see a lot of
> projects in C#, and I think all the major distributions are shipping
> mono now.

Ahem, not quite true [1].


Glynn

[1] although depends on your definition of 'major'.




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]