Mono bindings a blessed dependency? [Was: Tomboy in 2.16]
- From: "Elijah Newren" <newren gmail com>
- To: "Vincent Untz" <vuntz gnome org>
- Cc: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Mono bindings a blessed dependency? [Was: Tomboy in 2.16]
- Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 14:19:22 -0600
On 4/19/06, Vincent Untz <vuntz gnome org> wrote:
> My main question is about the Gtk# bindings: should we include them in
> the bindings set before including an app?
Personally, I definitely think that should be a requirement, yes.
But, a more important question: We currently only allow apps using the
python bindings into the desktop. There are other languages bindings
in our release set, but none of them have been similarly blessed.
Assuming Gtk# is added to the bindings set, should it be a language
core apps can use?
My personal opinion is that we should try to prevent having too many
blessed languages to prevent maintainence problems (*cough* sawfish
*cough*) but that we need to balance that with the number of apps,
their coolness, and the size of the Gnome community behind them (i.e.
likelihood of finding a new maintainer). Not all may agree with those
criteria though...
So, new question we have to address before addressing Alex's proposal:
Should Mono be a valid dependency and C# a blessed language?
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]