Re: Re:Mono bindings a blessed dependency? [Was: Tomboy in 2.16]

[Federico Mena Quintero <federico ximian com>]

On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 23:00 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:

> The desktop already depends on the bindings since we have some python
> love in the desktop :-) The question is, do we accept all languages in
> the desktop, or just a small selection of what's available in the
> bindings (and which selection?).

Accepting Ada bindings because there is a fantastic stock ticker written
in Ada is probably not a good reason to do it.

Accepting Mono because there is a fantastic search infrastructure and a
fantastic photo management app written in Mono *is* a good reason to
accept gtk-sharp.

I mean, nobody can live without solitaire card games, and so we pull in
Guile [if not the GTK+ bindings [are they still alive?]].

  Federico