Re: Supporting po/LINGUAS in 2.16
- From: Adam Schreiber <sadam CLEMSON EDU>
- To: Behdad Esfahbod <behdad cs toronto edu>
- Cc: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Supporting po/LINGUAS in 2.16
- Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 20:09:16 -0400
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> Completely agreed. As someone who wrote one of the current
> goals, I was a bit scared by how the goal went live with review
> from only three people, and it could have been flawed seriously.
> In this case (AppIcons) it probably is not, but the PoLinguas
> raised the internal this-is-a-nasty-hack signal of me too. It
> indeed works *for now*, but I too think that we should not spent
> this massive effort on things we know should change soon.
Behdad,
While we're on the topic of the AppIcon goal, could you respond to the
question raised earlier today?
> Can I ask for a little bit of clarification on this goal? Is this
> only supposed to apply to the application icon? What about apps that
> provide different icons (toolbar icons, etc.)? Are these expected to
> still be installed to $datadir/pixmaps? or should they follow the
> same pattern described for app icons?
> Jonner
Thanks,
Adam Schreiber
- --
Why isn't all of your email protected?
http://gnupg.org
http://enigmail.mozdev.org
http://seahorse.sourceforge.net
http://live.gnome.org/Seahorse
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3rc2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFEOvOsjU1oaHEI4wgRAlNTAKCd4SbeSiHWY09GLCOJS7/DmSe0yACgvIS1
ibOUnq/sfS/CEObE3kO3WIo=
=UT4q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]