Re: Dumping gnome-smproxy in 2.14

Mark McLoughlin wrote:

Hi Ghee,

On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 11:51 +0100, ghee teo wrote:

(a) Create a new CVS module that just contains smproxy

	I've no problem at all with you doing this.

	However, do note that you'll also need patches to make GNOME not get
screwed up with gnome-smproxy - e.g. bugs #118063, #309506 and #147691.
   First of all, let me clarify, this module will be be part of the GNOME
platform release, but it  is more there who needs it can take it. If those
bugs can be fixed it will be a place to putback to. Meanwhile, these bugs can
be assigned against this module.
I disgree with that above mentioned patches should be included as a prior condition where this module is imported to CVS though. It is more likely that
fixing these bugs will involve changes to more than just smproxy.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]