Re: make distcheck in tinderbox [was Re: make check failures- gnome-vfs, e-d-s, at-spi]
- From: Ikke <eikke eikke com>
- To: Matthias Clasen <mclasen redhat com>
- Cc: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: make distcheck in tinderbox [was Re: make check failures- gnome-vfs, e-d-s, at-spi]
- Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 20:24:17 +0200
On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 13:41 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > I think the advantages of adding make distcheck are bigger than the
> > disadvantages.
> > In the end, being able to do make a tinderbox with make distcheck
> and
> > CFLAGS+="-Wall -Werror -pedantic -ansi" would be so cool ;-)
> >
>
> -Wall -ansi -pedantic -Werror is not going to fly. See e.g.
>
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=310175
Then we got some work to do ;-)
IMHO these CFLAGS force devs to write cleaner (and sometimes even more
secure) code, which is a good thing :-)
Ikke
- References:
- make check failures- gnome-vfs, e-d-s, at-spi
- Re: make check failures- gnome-vfs, e-d-s, at-spi
- make distcheck in tinderbox [was Re: make check failures- gnome-vfs, e-d-s, at-spi]
- Re: make distcheck in tinderbox [was Re: make check failures- gnome-vfs, e-d-s, at-spi]
- Re: make distcheck in tinderbox [was Re: make check failures- gnome-vfs, e-d-s, at-spi]
- Re: make distcheck in tinderbox [was Re: make check failures- gnome-vfs, e-d-s, at-spi]
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]