On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 09:04 -0400, Luis Villa wrote: > Also, Colin, does eggcups still depend on a patched cupsd? I'm not > sure if that should matter, but seems like it is relevant for testing, > etc. Thinking about this a bit on the drive in, I realized what you were probably driving at is the impact of having eggcups running without a patched cupsd. What will happen with the existing code right now is the user never sees the icon and it just takes up a small amount of memory. I could pretty trivially change that so it removes itself from the session and exits. Thus GNOME users on non-patched cups systems would get a negligible check on first login and never thereafter. Does that answer the question?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part