Re: Remove GnomeMeeting from Gnome module list?

[Damien Sandras <dsandras seconix com>]

And I also wonder about this GEP with version numbers...

Should I follow the version numbers from GNOME? I know it is better, but
it is also hard to achieve. Everybody knows that 2.00 will be the
release with SIP support. But if bump the version number to 2.12 (when
GM with SIP is ready), then it might become confusing for users.

But again, if the release team decides that GnomeMeeting has to stay in
the modules, I will comply with any rule.


Le mercredi 19 janvier 2005 à 09:33 +0100, Damien Sandras a écrit :

> That's what I have always done. But I still wonder a few things :
> - I would put a word about branches. It is sometimes confusing to know
> what to do.
> 
> - There should be a rule to determine if maintainers have to do a minor
> release in phase with the GNOME release just to update translations or
> not. That could be good and solve many problems.
> 
> We have to admit GnomeMeeting was a special case here as the version was
> the same in GNOME 2.6 and GNOME 2.8, so it might seem logical to think a
> minor release is not required as it had already had a string and code
> freeze for GNOME 2.6.
> 
> I planned to have GnomeMeeting 1.2 ready for GNOME 2.8, but I couldn't
> complete it. So it was completed after GNOME 2.8 and before GNOME 2.10.
> I can not really control that.
> 

-- 
 _      Damien Sandras
(o-     GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/
//\     FOSDEM 2005 : http://www.fosdem.org
v_/_    H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras seconix com