Re: API freeze and feature freeze on Jan 10th

[Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net>]

On Sat, 2005-01-08 at 12:02 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-01-05 at 16:34 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > On Wed, 2005-01-05 at 11:31 +0000, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2005-01-05 at 12:21 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2005-01-05 at 11:14 +0000, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > > > > Just to note that the API freeze will leave nautilus-cd-burner in a bad
> > > > > state. I haven't had time to finish the work I started on it, and the
> > > > > API is still a bit in motion.
> > > > 
> > > > What new API has been (or will be) added/changed?
> > > > 
> > > > What are the consequences of using the older API? Maybe it can wait for
> > > > 2.11/2.11?
> > > 
> > > There's no older API, we renamed everything to be namespaced. There are
> > > unfinished APIs (like nautilus_burn_recorder_blank_disc()).
> > 
> > Does this mean that reverting to an older version means reverting to
> > nautilus 2.8? Is there any way to punt this to GNOME 2.11/2.12 without
> > regressions?
> > 
> > Is nautilus-cd-burner used by anything other than nautilus in GNOME
> > 2.10? If not, then a slightly-delayed freeze of the nautilus-cd-burner
> > API would not have much disadvantage. This would fit in with our regular
> > API-freeze-break process.
> > 
> > But I'd like to avoid delaying the API freeze for everything else. Just
> > my opinion though.
> 
> So, does it seem like nautilus-cd-burner still needs special
> consideration for the feature-freeze on the 10th? If yes, what are those
> features?

It didn't. I'll finish off the rest of what needs to be done by bug
fixing (DVD blanking, it's not used by anything yet...).

---
Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net>