Re: API freeze and feature freeze on Jan 10th

[Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>]

On Wed, 2005-01-05 at 16:34 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-01-05 at 11:31 +0000, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > On Wed, 2005-01-05 at 12:21 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2005-01-05 at 11:14 +0000, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > > > Just to note that the API freeze will leave nautilus-cd-burner in a bad
> > > > state. I haven't had time to finish the work I started on it, and the
> > > > API is still a bit in motion.
> > > 
> > > What new API has been (or will be) added/changed?
> > > 
> > > What are the consequences of using the older API? Maybe it can wait for
> > > 2.11/2.11?
> > 
> > There's no older API, we renamed everything to be namespaced. There are
> > unfinished APIs (like nautilus_burn_recorder_blank_disc()).
> 
> Does this mean that reverting to an older version means reverting to
> nautilus 2.8? Is there any way to punt this to GNOME 2.11/2.12 without
> regressions?
> 
> Is nautilus-cd-burner used by anything other than nautilus in GNOME
> 2.10? If not, then a slightly-delayed freeze of the nautilus-cd-burner
> API would not have much disadvantage. This would fit in with our regular
> API-freeze-break process.
> 
> But I'd like to avoid delaying the API freeze for everything else. Just
> my opinion though.

So, does it seem like nautilus-cd-burner still needs special
consideration for the feature-freeze on the 10th? If yes, what are those
features?

-- 
Murray Cumming
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com