Re: Proposed modules: my consensus so far
- From: Carlos Garnacho <carlosg gnome org>
- To: Sean Middleditch <elanthis awesomeplay com>
- Cc: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Proposed modules: my consensus so far
- Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 21:09:26 +0100
On Mon, 2005-01-10 at 09:59 -0500, Sean Middleditch wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-01-10 at 14:43 +0000, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
>
> > 1) I think a better way of implementing this type of stuff is for
> > gnome-system-monitor to have two modes - an admin mode and a user
> > mode. You might have two binaries and .desktop files, one marked as
> > "this needs to be run as root", or you might just have it so if you
> > decide not to enter the root password it runs in user mode.
>
> That sounds grotesque and complicated. The idea of using a backend
> process for this sounds a lot nicer, as someone else mentioned. The
> frontend always, always runs as the user (which also means it always
> keeps the user settings, theme, etc) and any admin-tasks are done
> through a backend process that can run as either the user or root. User
> clicks an Authenticate button to kill the current backend process and
> restart it as root. The API for killing and restarting the backend
> should be as abstract as possible so that the implementation can
> replaced with no change to apps to support gnomesu, console-helper,
> whatever.
>
> Perhaps gnome-system-tools already has a component that can be used for
> this? (It's been a while since I used gst last...)
The API is quite internal, but could be detached with some (little)
effort
Regards
>
> _______________________________________________
> desktop-devel-list mailing list
> desktop-devel-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]