Re: Exciting GNOME?

On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 00:29 -0400, Steven Garrity wrote:
> Ryan McDougall wrote:
> > While the default theme *is* butt-ugly, I also recall there being some
> > concerns that its was more accessible or had less usability bugs or
> > something, and replacing it meant trying to fix a whole new slough of
> > bugs (can anyone correct me on this?).
> If there was anything close to consensus in the last round of debate 
> about a new default theme (Glider? Indubstrial?), it might be nice to 
> get it in right at the beginning of 2.11 and start to deal with any new 
> accessibility issues (and get the artists working on refinements).

And this part is really important.  We didn't change the default theme
for 2.8 because we waited too long, and there was a lot of talk about
changing it right at the beginning of 2.9.  It didn't happen.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]