Re: Gnome 2.10 Showstoppers : the list

[Luis Villa <luis villa gmail com>]

On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 01:49:59 -0500, Luis Villa <luis villa gmail com> wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Feb 2005 07:43:43 +0100, Paolo Borelli <pborelli katamail com> wrote:
> > read http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110191 and in particular
> > the comment #20. We have (almost) the code, but we are not confortable
> > with the testing: it will go in as soon as 2.11 is branched so to get
> > tested for a whole developement cycle.
> >
> > And no, it obviously isn't a show stopper nor a regression.
> 
> Yeah, absolutely not. It would be great for someone to do an audit of
> this kind of thing and have it as a focus for 2.12, but it totally
> isn't a showstopper.

(On a non-release-team-y note, if this is so hard to do, does that
indicate something is deeply fucked in our APIs?)

Luis