Re: Hide extensions [Was: Nautilus]
- From: Andy Hanton <andyhanton comcast net>
- To: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Hide extensions [Was: Nautilus]
- Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 08:53:35 -0500
On Thu, 2005-12-22 at 09:26 +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Iau, 2005-12-22 at 10:36 +0200, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> > capable of seeing the reasoning behind it... and can certainly believe
> > it if somebody tells me that it in fact has been shown to reduce
> > confusion among novice users.)
>
> Extensions are very much a windows property rather than a non-windows
> tradition anyway. In terms of confusion the large number of attacks
> based on extension hiding clearly indicate that it does confuse users to
> a large degree and in dangerous ways
I think a large part of the problem is that windows doesn't hide
extensions everywhere. The users can be tricked because they expect to
see extensions. Mac OS X uses extensions and hides them by default in
all programs. I haven't heard of anybody running a directory named
exploit.jpeg.app. Since convincing every desktop application developer
to follow a hide extension preference would be impossible, adding one is
probably a bad idea.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]