Re: Revisiting the Gnome Bindings
- From: Mikael Hallendal <micke imendio com>
- To: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- Cc: Thomas Vander Stichele <thomas apestaart org>, gnome-desktop-devel <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Revisiting the Gnome Bindings
- Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 08:27:43 +0200
Havoc Pennington wrote:
Hi,
Personally I'd support adding pygtk *only* - because it's a very clearly
different kind of language than C, appropriate in different cases. So it
would still be useful even if we added a new "system programming"
language like C++/C#/Java someday.
I totally agree here, the C#/Java dead lock should not be in the way of
adding Python to the platform. Python would fit *very* well in the
platform even if we added C#/Java. And the Python bindings are widely
accepted throughout GNOME and is a proven language for writing GUI
tools/applications.
Regards,
Mikael Hallendal
--
Imendio HB, http://www.imendio.com/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]