Re: the future of the release team

[David Bolter <david bolter utoronto ca>]

Mark McLoughlin wrote:

> On Fri, 2004-09-24 at 14:11, Bill Haneman wrote:
>
>  
>
> > Any changes to established processes are like changes to interfaces;
> > they inevitably generate errors even when they are self-evident
> > improvements.  So let's not change the interfaces unless they clearly
> > need improving.
> >    
>
> 	You're not a robot. We won't need to be re-build you for the new
> interface. You're not beyond the tiniest bit of change, right ? :-)
>
> 	Seriously, I've tried to give a very detailed rationale for the
> suggestion and your objection boils down to "we'd have to use a
> different email address to send patches". We need to be more open to
> change than that.
>
>  
I amazed at how differently I interpret both of your positions. 

Mark, one thing I want to clarify: the "release team" as an engine is 
due for an overhaul/checkup?  If this doesn't happen things are headed 
for badness?

D

> Cheers,
> Mark.
>
> _______________________________________________
> desktop-devel-list mailing list
> desktop-devel-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
>