Re: Should Desktop = Home?
- From: gabor <gabor z10n net>
- To: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Should Desktop = Home?
- Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2004 11:34:39 +0200
On Sun, Oct 03, 2004 at 11:21:51AM +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> <quote who="Steven Garrity">
>
> > Should we merge the Home directory with the Desktop directory?
>
> This was discussed to death a long time ago, on both desktop-devel-list and
> nautilus-list. Originally, I thought it would be a good idea too. It's not.
> Probably the best thing to do is go back and read the old threads about
> this.
i've read some of them,
and there seems to be only one central reason:
-your Desktop is your document store
-means that every FILE in ~/Desktop is an atomic unit
-means that deleting any FILE from ~/Desktop is safe
-means you can delete anything that's on the desktop,
and all your apps will still work
and this is true, but it also works if we say that:
-your $HOME (except the .hidden folders) is your document store
-the same things apply
-all the apps that create nonhidden folders are buggy
maybe i did not understand all the points raised in this discussion.
you said you thought it's a good idea, but now you think it's a bad
idea. could you tell us why you changed your opinion?
anyway, to have $HOME or $HOME/Desktop is not really the big issue here.
the big issue is that the user has 2 (two) directories where he should
look for files. and that's a bad thing.
so, if we promote $HOME/Desktop as the document store, why do we
provide an icon on the desktop that takes them back th $HOME?
maybe because many-apps-still-save-files-into-$HOME-and-so-on?
to reformulate:
should the users simply forget about $HOME?
if that's the case, we should remove that icon from the desktop.
if it's not the case, we should do things differently...
gabor
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]