On tor, 2004-05-13 at 10:04 -0600, Andreas J. Guelzow wrote: > On Thu, 2004-05-13 at 09:39, Cedric Marcone wrote: > > Hey Mr "Prof. Dr." ... > > > > stop the FUD, and use a brain cell : > > Excuse me? Yeah, agree, this was totally uncalled for. > > There's a key named "always_use_browser". Isn't it a well choosen name ? > > It is only a well "chosen" name if you realize that `browser' here does > not refer to nautilus interaction with web browsers. > > In any case, I have to decide whether to install gnome 2.6, stick with > gnome 2.4 or to change to KDE. In the moment (and after I was told in a > long thread on another gnome list that gnumeric is in fact not part of > GNOME) the latter looks like the most likely result. Being insulted > after asking a simple question, does not persuade me to stay a part of > the GNOME community. I don't think you should judge the entire GNOME community because someone on a mailing list insults you. That would be most unfortunate since all the GNOME lists are open and anyone can post on them... If you switch to KDE I would think it's because of more than the fact that you have to change a key in GConf and is of course your decision. Gnumeric is part of GNOME Office which is a separate bundling of applications. Best Regards, Mikael Hallendal -- Imendio HB, http://www.imendio.com/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Detta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E4r?= en digitalt signerad meddelandedel