Re: Where we stand in regard to the future platform / desktop technology
- From: jamie <jamiemcc blueyonder co uk>
- To: Markus Bertheau <twanger bluetwanger de>
- Cc: GNOME Desktop Hackers <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Where we stand in regard to the future platform / desktop technology
- Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 12:50:20 +0100
On Sun, 2004-03-28 at 12:39, Markus Bertheau wrote:
> В Вск, 28.03.2004, в 13:29, jamie пишет:
>
> > For Gnome 3, the options increase to having C and Mono (with the Python
> > in 2.8 running on Mono).
>
> They only do if the legal situation clears up. That was my point. Do you
> agree? Or do you think, from a legal POV, Mono is a viable way to go for
> the community already?
Well MS (with Intel and HP) declared it royalty free albeit via a
development manager. If they were to do a u-turn they would not only be
in hot water with US and EU competition commissions but they would also
lose all trust or faith in themselves - it would be a massive PR failure
and I think its inconceivable that would happen.
The legal situation should be cleared up long before we get to Gnome 3
anyways.
jamie.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]